Yorkshire and the Humber's planning landscape is changing but not at the same pace
by David Sweeting, Planning Director
Published 1 October 2026
England is entering a significant period of planning change, and Yorkshire is at the forefront of this. For developers and landowners, the important point is not simply that the planning system is changing, it is that different parts of the region are moving through that change at very different speeds.
The new National Planning Policy Framework was published in August 2026, and the new plan-making system is now in force. Across Yorkshire and the Humber, these changes must be implemented by a patchwork of authorities at very different stages of Local Plan preparation and review. That matters because the opportunity to influence the future development of a site can look very different depending on which authority boundary it sits.
In Sheffield, for example, the emerging Local Plan is approaching the end of examination, with consultation now under way on a limited number of further Main Modifications, rather than a wider reopening of the Plan. Doncaster, by contrast, is at the beginning of preparing its next Local Plan and has opened a Call for Sites. Rotherham has moved away from its proposed partial update and is instead starting work towards a new Local Plan.
The contrast is important. A developer looking at opportunities across South Yorkshire is not dealing with one planning market. In one authority, the immediate task may be understanding the implications of a substantially progressed policy framework. A few miles away, there may be an opportunity to influence the evidence and spatial choices that will shape development into the 2040s.
The same issue appears in West Yorkshire, although with another layer of complexity. Leeds has started preparing its new Local Plan under the new system, while other authorities are working from plans adopted at different points in the previous cycle. At the same time, the proposed West Yorkshire Mass Transit network is bringing transport, regeneration and land-use planning together at a strategic level. The five West Yorkshire authorities are currently progressing a joint Spatial Development Framework intended to coordinate development around that network.
That creates a different consideration for developers. The planning prospects of land cannot necessarily be understood by looking at its current allocation alone. Future transport infrastructure, regeneration priorities and the direction of the next Local Plan may all change the strategic context in which a site is considered.
That does not mean that land close to proposed infrastructure automatically becomes a development opportunity. Constraints, infrastructure capacity, viability and deliverability remain fundamental. It does mean that understanding where policy and investment are heading can be as important as understanding where they are today.
North Yorkshire illustrates the point in a different way again. Following local government reorganisation, North Yorkshire Council is preparing a single Local Plan to replace the different planning frameworks inherited from the former district councils. Its programme anticipates the next scoping consultation beginning on 23 October 2026. The plan will cover the council’s area outside the North York Moors and Yorkshire Dales National Parks, with York remaining a separate Local Plan authority.
The challenge there is not simply updating policy. It is establishing a spatial strategy across a large and diverse area containing very different settlements, markets, infrastructure conditions and development pressures. For landowners with longer-term interests, historic district boundaries and existing allocations remain relevant, but they cannot simply be assumed to dictate the approach of the new authority.
The Humber adds a fourth perspective, covering Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire. Here, too, there is no single planning timetable.
North Lincolnshire withdrew its previous emerging Local Plan from examination in 2024 and is now progressing a new plan under the new national system. Its scoping consultation closed on 1 September 2026. The emphasis is therefore on understanding the next stages and the evidence needed to inform future spatial choices, rather than assuming the withdrawn plan establishes the direction of travel.
East Riding of Yorkshire starts from a different position. Its Local Plan Update was adopted in April 2025, but the council is already preparing its next plan, with a scoping consultation that closed on 31 August 2026. Developers need to distinguish the adopted policies guiding decisions today from the emerging choices that will shape the next plan period. A recently adopted plan does not mean there is no reason to engage with what comes next.
Devolution adds a strategic layer across the whole region. Mayoral authorities bring together investment, transport, housing and regeneration priorities, while Spatial Development Strategies are intended to address growth and infrastructure across council boundaries. For developers and landowners, this means understanding the wider investment and spatial strategy as well as the individual Local Plan.
These geographies do not match the four areas neatly. South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire have their own mayoral authorities, while York and North Yorkshire share one. Across the Humber, Hull and East Riding sit within the Hull and East Yorkshire Combined Authority; North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire form part of Greater Lincolnshire alongside Lincolnshire. Cross-Humber opportunities therefore need to be considered across more than one strategic authority.
Additional mayoral planning powers are also moving towards implementation. The Government’s consultation, open until 5 October 2026, addresses intervention in strategically important applications, Mayoral Development Orders and a Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy. These should not be presented as powers already operating uniformly across the region. Their implementation could affect the route to planning permission and infrastructure funding for major schemes, making early engagement with both the relevant planning authority and strategic authority increasingly important.
Taken together, these changes point to a wider issue for anyone making development decisions in Yorkshire and the Humber.
There is no single moment at which the region moves from one planning framework to another. Some authorities are making fundamental choices about their future growth now; others have already made many of those choices. Strategic infrastructure and investment are also beginning to alter the context within which future plans will be prepared.
That makes timing an increasingly important part of planning strategy.
For a developer or landowner, the question should not only be “what does the Local Plan say about my site?” It should also be “where is this authority in its planning cycle, what is likely to shape its next strategy and when do I need to engage?”
Waiting until an emerging plan reaches a formal adoption stage can mean waiting until some of the most important strategic decisions have already been made. Equally, putting land forward early without the evidence to demonstrate accessibility, infrastructure capacity and deliverability is unlikely to establish a compelling case for development.
The opportunity lies in understanding both the place and the point in the planning cycle.
Yorkshire and the Humber may be experiencing the same national planning reforms, but their consequences will be distinctly local. For developers looking across the region, recognising those differences early could help shape proposals that are acceptable in planning terms, attract local support and inform where, when and how development is pursued.